Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo)
Key Details
| Taxonomic Groups: | Vertebrate > bird > Bird |
| Red List Status: | Least Concern (Non-breeding) / Near Threatened (Breeding) [LC(nbr) NT(br)] |
| D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
| Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
| Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
| UKSI Recommended Name: | Phalacrocorax carbo |
| UKSI Recommended Authority: | (Linnaeus, 1758) |
| UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
| Red List Citation: | Stanbury et al., 2021 |
| Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
| Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | Info from seabird census needed. Long term non significant increase Eng BBS (25 yr +23%, 10 yr +7%). Eng WeBS trends (25 yr +74%, 10 yr +33%). Seabirds Count = a 6% increase in English population; coastal -13%, inland +30% Revised upon review that population is stable so conservation is not required at this stage. |
| Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | Info from seabird census needed. Long term non significant increase Eng BBS (25 yr +23%, 10 yr +7%). Eng WeBS trends (25 yr +74%, 10 yr +33%). Seabirds Count = a 6% increase in English population; coastal -13%, inland +30% Revised upon review that population is stable so conservation is not required at this stage. |
| Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
| Response: | N/A |
| Justification: |
Species Assessment
Not relevant as no Key Actions defined.
Key Actions
No Key Actions Defined
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.