Icy Rock-moss (Andreaea frigida)
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Non-vascular plant (incl. chromists) > moss > Moss |
Red List Status: | Vulnerable (Not Relevant) [VU(nr)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Andreaea frigida |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | Huebener |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | Callaghan, 2023 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | At risk of extinction in England due to small number of locations and projected continuing decline in the quality of its habitat |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | A species with low recovery potential where the main aim is to maintain/protect populations |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | No |
Justification: | The species has a restricted distribution and so is unlikely to benefit from untargeted actions |
Species Assessment
Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented |
Recovery potential/expectation: | Low - Combination or other (detail in comments) |
National Monitoring Resource: | Opportunistic - insufficient |
Species Comments: | GB RL criteria: B1ab(iii), B2ab(iii). Boreal-montane European species. Recovery potential low due to climate change and natural rarity. |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Develop and implement national monitoring plan to ensure comprehensive and up-to-date information is available on range size, population size, occupied sites and threatening factors in England
Action targets: 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented
Action type: Targeted monitoring
Duration: 1 year
Scale of Implementation: 1 site
High priority sites: Scafell Pikes SSSI
Comments: A species with low recovery potential where the main aim is to maintain/protect populations
Key Action 2
Proposed Action: Undertake species distribution modelling to understand the vulnerability of the species to projected climate change over the next 50 years
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 1 year
Scale of Implementation: National
High priority sites:
Comments: A Boreal-montane species that may be particularly vulnerable to climate warming
Key Action 3
Proposed Action: Consider the potential for the addition of this species as a designated interest feature of Scafell Pikes SSSI.
Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales
Action type: Site protection
Duration: 1 year
Scale of Implementation: 1 site
High priority sites: Scafell Pikes SSSI
Comments: Recognition as a SSSI designated interest feature will help to ensure adequate monitoring and conservation attention
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.