Green Woodpecker (Picus viridis)
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Vertebrate > bird > Bird |
Red List Status: | Near Threatened (Breeding) [NT(br)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Picus viridis |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | Linnaeus, 1758 |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | Stanbury et al., 2021 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Medium term significant decline Eng BBS ( 10 yr -27% 5 yr -20%, 1yr -16% ). |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Research required to identify the causes of decline |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Areas of short natural/semi-natural grassland with high plant richness are beneficial for Green Woodpecker. Bare ground within woodland would also be beneficial |
Species Assessment
Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 4. Autecology and pressures understood |
Recovery potential/expectation: | Medium-high |
National Monitoring Resource: | Structured - sufficient |
Species Comments: |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Research required to identify the causes of decline (especially in Southern and Western England).
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 10 sites
High priority sites:
Comments:
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.