Lesser Tussock-sedge (Carex diandra)
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Vascular plant > flowering plant > Sedge |
Red List Status: | Near Threatened (Not Relevant) [NT(nr)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Carex diandra |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | Schrank |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | in Stroh et al., 2014 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | VU at England level; |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Needs action directed at sites where it grows |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | No |
Justification: | Restricted to specific sites |
Species Assessment
Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 2. Biological status assessment exists |
Recovery potential/expectation: | Medium-high |
National Monitoring Resource: | Opportunistic - insufficient |
Species Comments: |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Devise a national monitoring plan and apply
Action targets: 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented
Action type: Targeted monitoring
Duration: Unknown
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 50 sites
High priority sites:
Comments: Difficult plant to monitor - seasonality, small size, many sites - coordinated effort by local recorders?
Key Action 2
Proposed Action: Research needs of this species - requires complex hydrochemistry
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: National
High priority sites:
Comments: Will need water sampling and testing
Key Action 3
Proposed Action: Implement management plans at sites to address need to maintain hydro-geological conditions necessary and appropriate annual management
Action targets: 6. Recovery solutions trialled
Action type: Habitat management
Duration: Unknown
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 50 sites
High priority sites:
Comments:
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.