Scraptia fuscula

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Invertebrate > insect - beetle (Coleoptera) > Darkling beetle or ally
Red List Status: Vulnerable (Not Relevant) [VU(nr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Scraptia fuscula
UKSI Recommended Authority: Müller, P.W.J., 1821
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: Alexander et al., 2014
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: Vulnerable based on the geographic range restricted in area of occupancy (less than 6 tetrads) with severely fragmented populations (currently known from 6 localities across central southern England) and projected continuing decline in area, extent and quality of habitat. The majority of records are from the wider historic area of Windsor Forest and Great Park, including Silwood Park, and other neighbouring areas, in Buckinghamshire and Surrey, but there is an apparently reliable record also from Brockworth Park in East Gloucestershire.
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Minimum intervention management will not provide conditions suitable for the development of successive generations of veteran trees, and well-planned tree planting remains the exception rather than the rule.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: No
Justification: This species would not benefit from untargeted management

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales
Recovery potential/expectation: Low - Relict or natural rarity
National Monitoring Resource: Opportunistic - insufficient
Species Comments: Larvae develop in relatively soft rotten heartwood of oak

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Create a UK DNA sequence, and primers to allow eDNA sampling.

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 2 years

Scale of Implementation: 1 site

High priority sites: Windsor Forest

Comments: To allow less invasive detection in saproxylic substrates. This can run in parallel with Action 2.

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: At sites where the species occurs document age structure for potential host veteran trees and future veterans, to determine whether there is an adequate rate of replacement. Also assess requirements for management of the veteran tree stock to reduce the risk of wind throw, by undertaking tree surgery to reduce the crown of excessive bough weighting.

Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales

Action type: Targeted monitoring

Duration: 2 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: Windsor Great Park, Silwood Park (Berkshire) and Richmond Park (Surrey). Also in Buckinghamshire though specific locations not mentioned in the red-list.

Comments:

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: At sites where the species occurs, plant oak trees or promote natural regeneration if there has been insufficient recruitment of younger age classes.

Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales

Action type: Habitat management

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: Prioritisation is subject to assessment of tree age structure at all sites where the species occurs

Comments: Either planting or natural regeneration should not be allowed to create crown competition or cast shade on existing veteran trees.

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.