Arthonia ilicinella
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Fungus or lichen > lichen > Lichen |
Red List Status: | Near Threatened (Not Relevant) [NT(nr)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Arthonia ilicinella |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | Nyl. |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | Woods & Coppins, 2012 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Very rare, with few sites known, possibly initially parasitic on Arthonia ilicina |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Likely to respond well to general vegetation management at its known locations but survey needed of extant sites and targeted action needed at Borrowdale. |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Part of a large group of species threatened by under grazing of old growth woodlands |
Species Assessment
Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 4. Autecology and pressures understood |
Recovery potential/expectation: | Medium-high |
National Monitoring Resource: | Opportunistic - insufficient |
Species Comments: | Healthy populations require extensively grazed minimum intervention pasture woodland, restoring grazing to woodlands is difficult and opposed by some policies |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Review habitat management at extant sites and assess suitability for the taxon.
Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified
Action type: Targeted monitoring
Duration: 2 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites
High priority sites:
Comments: Positive impacts on many threatened lichen species. Potential to bundle this with other grazing dependant woodland species
Key Action 2
Proposed Action: Advise on sustainable management of the Atlantic Hazel stands at Seatoller, Borrowdale Lake District
Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified
Action type: Advice & support
Duration: 1 year
Scale of Implementation: 1 site
High priority sites: Seatoller, Borrowdale
Comments: The habitat appears somewhat under grazed for Atlantic Hazel wood conservation, but there is pressure to reduced grazing further. The conflicting assessments require resolving.
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.