Leafscale Gulper Shark (Centrophorus squamosus)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Vertebrate > cartilaginous fish (Chondrichthyes) > Fish
Red List Status: (Not Relevant) [(not listed)(nr)]
D5 Status:
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Centrophorus squamosus
UKSI Recommended Authority: (Bonnaterre, 1788)
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: (not listed)
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: Endangered globally and in England, deep water shark knowledge is highly deficient. Vulnerable to bycatch.
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Species specific research required & Red List status update.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: No
Justification: This species would not benefit from untargeted management

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 1. Taxonomy established
Recovery potential/expectation: Low - Combination or other (detail in comments)
National Monitoring Resource: Opportunistic - insufficient
Species Comments: Life history, pressures outside England. Any recovery of the stock is likely to be very slow. Threatened by bycatch in deep water fisheries (policy conflict).

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Development of specific studies to assess the distribution patterns of species and to estimate the spatial overlap with fisheries.

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Targeted monitoring

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments:

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Incidental bycatch of leafscale gulper shark continues to take place in some deep-water fisheries targeting other species. Spatio-temporal management could be considered to further minimise bycatch (e.g. avoidance of some fishing grounds or times of the year where there is a spatial overlap between the target species of the fisheries and deep-water shark species). However, the information available is not adequate to frame such measures at present, therefore more research on this is needed.

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Pressure mitigation

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments: The species remains vulnerable to capture as bycatch in deep-water trawl fisheries for roundnose grenadier.

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: Update England Red List status

Action targets: 2. Biological status assessment exists

Action type: Status survey/review

Duration: 1 year

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments:

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.