Marsh Tit (Poecile palustris)
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Vertebrate > bird > Bird |
Red List Status: | Near Threatened (Breeding) [NT(br)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | Poecile palustris subsp. palustris/dresseri |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Poecile palustris |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | (Linnaeus, 1758) |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | Stanbury et al., 2021 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | in s41 as Poecile palustris subsp. palustris/dresseri |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Long term significant decline Eng BBS (25 yr -46%, 10 yr -26%). |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Juvenile survival to be researched, habitat connectivity issue |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Focus woodland management and corridor creation in landscapes with woodland blocks in close proximity due to species' limited dispersal ability (1-2km) |
Species Assessment
Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 5. Remedial action identified |
Recovery potential/expectation: | Medium-high |
National Monitoring Resource: | Structured - sufficient |
Species Comments: | BBS trend becoming less robust |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Research into competition between Marsh tit and Great tit/Blue tit in relation habitat and natural/supplementary food use.
Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites
High priority sites:
Comments:
Key Action 2
Proposed Action: Understand the nature and drivers post juvenile survival using (colour ringing, movements, survival, biometrics, population and age structure
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites
High priority sites:
Comments:
Key Action 3
Proposed Action: Use a combination of existing data and new fieldwork to examine how to best to delivery landscape-scale resilience for Marsh tits by increasing the connectivity between populations.
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: Unknown
High priority sites:
Comments:
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.