Grey Plover (Pluvialis squatarola)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Vertebrate > bird > Bird
Red List Status: Vulnerable (Non-breeding) [VU(nbr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Pluvialis squatarola
UKSI Recommended Authority: (Linnaeus, 1758)
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: Stanbury et al., 2021
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: Eng WeBS trends (25 yr -39%, 10 yr -11%)
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Protection of key wintering sites
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: Yes
Justification: coastal/saltmarsh habitat creation could benefit the species as could blanket protection of large stretches of coastline

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales
Recovery potential/expectation: Medium-high
National Monitoring Resource: Structured - sufficient
Species Comments: Climate change may be a factor

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Consider and as appropriate implement the recommendations of SPA Reviews for this species. This should include both outstanding actions from the 2001 SPA Review and any additional recommendations of the 2016 SPA Review.

Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales

Action type: Site protection

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 50 sites

High priority sites:

Comments:

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Conduct research into the drivers of change in the non-breeding population in England

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments: Could be a PhD

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.