Greenfinch (Chloris chloris)
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Vertebrate > bird > Bird |
Red List Status: | Endangered (Breeding) [EN(br)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Chloris chloris |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | (Linnaeus, 1758) |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | Stanbury et al., 2021 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Long term significant decline Eng BBS (25 yr -66%, 10 yr -60%) |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Continue to monitor the effect of Trichomonas in Greenfinch. |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Habitat not a limiting factor for this species, but would benefit from general habitat heterogeneity and increased scrub cover. |
Species Assessment
Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 5. Remedial action identified |
Recovery potential/expectation: | Low - Pathogen, hybridisation, INNS |
National Monitoring Resource: | Structured - sufficient |
Species Comments: | Trichomonas responsible for population decline |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Promote improved garden bird feeding hygiene measures to mitigate the effects of avian disease.
Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified
Action type: Pressure mitigation
Duration: >10 years
Scale of Implementation: National
High priority sites:
Comments:
Key Action 2
Proposed Action: Investigate whether provision of wild bird seed mixtures in agricultural landscapes would mitigates for a reduction in garden feeding and reduce the spread of avian disease.
Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: National
High priority sites:
Comments:
Key Action 3
Proposed Action: Conduct research into Trichomonas/FPV risk at supplementary feeding sites, and identify and test potential remedial measures (e.g. new designs for feeders and water provision).
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites
High priority sites:
Comments: Priority action
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.