Greenfinch (Chloris chloris)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Vertebrate > bird > Bird
Red List Status: Endangered (Breeding) [EN(br)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Chloris chloris
UKSI Recommended Authority: (Linnaeus, 1758)
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: Stanbury et al., 2021
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: Long term significant decline Eng BBS (25 yr -66%, 10 yr -60%)
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Continue to monitor the effect of Trichomonas in Greenfinch.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: Yes
Justification: Habitat not a limiting factor for this species, but would benefit from general habitat heterogeneity and increased scrub cover.

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 5. Remedial action identified
Recovery potential/expectation: Low - Pathogen, hybridisation, INNS
National Monitoring Resource: Structured - sufficient
Species Comments: Trichomonas responsible for population decline

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Promote improved garden bird feeding hygiene measures to mitigate the effects of avian disease.

Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified

Action type: Pressure mitigation

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments:

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Investigate whether provision of wild bird seed mixtures in agricultural landscapes would mitigates for a reduction in garden feeding and reduce the spread of avian disease.

Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments:

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: Conduct research into Trichomonas/FPV risk at supplementary feeding sites, and identify and test potential remedial measures (e.g. new designs for feeders and water provision).

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites

High priority sites:

Comments: Priority action

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.