Dunlin (Calidris alpina)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Vertebrate > bird > Bird
Red List Status: Vulnerable (Both Breeding & Non-breeding) [VU(br/nbr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Calidris alpina
UKSI Recommended Authority: (Linnaeus, 1758)
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: Stanbury et al., 2021
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: No Eng breeding trend. Eng WeBS trends (25 yr -44%, 10 yr -9%)
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Need to determine Eng breeding population. Decline in wintering numbers.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: No
Justification: Removal of forestry plantations around moorland nesting areas, but needs targeting around suitable peatland landscapes.

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Recovery potential/expectation: Medium-high
National Monitoring Resource: Combination - insufficient
Species Comments: England breeding population info needed.

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Develop and implement monitoring plan to produce estimates and trends of breeding numbers in England.

Action targets: 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented

Action type: Status survey/review

Duration: 2 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites

High priority sites: N and S Pennines SPAs, NW Saltmarshes, Dartmoor, Peak District, West Pennine Moors

Comments:

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Habitat restoration and management at key sites including peatland restoration at upland sites and saltmarsh grazing supported by trial management.

Action targets: 6. Recovery solutions trialled

Action type: Habitat management

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: N and S Pennines SPAs; Dartmoor, NW Estuaries

Comments:

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: Consider and as appropriate implement the recommendations of SPA reviews for this species. This should include both outstanding actions from the 2001 SPA Review and additional recommendations of the 2016 SPA Review. Up to date evidence is also required.

Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales

Action type: Site protection

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments: N and S Pennines not formally classified for breeding Dunlin as per 2001 SPA Review recommendations.

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.