Land Quillwort (Isoetes histrix)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Vascular plant > quillwort > Quillwort
Red List Status: Vulnerable (Not Relevant) [VU(nr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Isoetes histrix
UKSI Recommended Authority: Bory
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: in Stroh et al., 2014
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: VU in GB & England. Pearman et al. (2014) document a decline since 1982 of 71% in number of sub-sites & 95% in overall tally of plants.
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Targeted conservation of serpentine rock outcrops (both in coastal zone & inland) needed to restore lost populations.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: Yes
Justification: Widespread reintroduction of extensive grazing to coastal slopes & heathland has unquestionably aided species, but more widespread grazing / disturbance of outcrop grasslands likely to encourage further spread

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales
Recovery potential/expectation: Medium-high
National Monitoring Resource: Combination - insufficient
Species Comments: Loss of up to 71% of subsites since 1982 probably due to (i) increased height of vegetation (both grass & scrub), (ii) build-up of dry organic litter/mor , humus, & proliferation of pleurocarpus mosses all leading to loss of bare mineral soil microsites for germination & growth. A changing climate also implicated & increasing aerial nutrient deposition may be involved. Fortunately, species thought to have long-lived spores (>34 years) so restoration from soil spore bank possible.

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Maintain or introduce programme of practical management at all sites known since c. 1980 including scrub clearance, moderate to heavy extensive grazing etc. to maintain sward at 1-2cm max. Targeted management of isolated inland colonies especially important as particularly vulnerable to extinction. Investigate options to link isolated heathland / rock outcrop sites to wider heathland landscape.

Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales

Action type: Habitat management

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites

High priority sites: Mullion Cliff to Predannack Cliff SSSI. West Lizard SSSI. Caerthillian to Kennack SSSI. Kennack to Coverack SSSI. Goonhilly Downs SSSI

Comments: Significant management work currently underway (2023-2025) through Species Recovery Programme within various Lizard SSSIs.

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Maintain database (established by David Pearman & Cornish botanists) of all current or post 1950 sites, to include known population size/extent, history and management. Monitor all populations on 1-3 year cycle.

Action targets: 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented

Action type: Targeted monitoring

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites

High priority sites: As listed under action 1

Comments:

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: Undertake research into autecology of species & response to various management regimes. Issues to assess include role of humus (undecomposed dry litter & mor humus) build-up; pleurocarpous moss growth; impact of drier springs etc. Review roles of grazing & disturbance in mitigating impacts.

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: Mullion Cliff to Predannack Cliff SSSI. West Lizard SSSI. Goonhilly Downs SSSI. Kennack to Coverack SSSI

Comments: Introduction of conservation grazing does not appear to have entirely reversed fortunes of species. More detailed assessment of causes at the micro-level required.

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.