Land Quillwort (Isoetes histrix)
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Vascular plant > quillwort > Quillwort |
Red List Status: | Vulnerable (Not Relevant) [VU(nr)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Isoetes histrix |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | Bory |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | in Stroh et al., 2014 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | VU in GB & England. Pearman et al. (2014) document a decline since 1982 of 71% in number of sub-sites & 95% in overall tally of plants. |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Targeted conservation of serpentine rock outcrops (both in coastal zone & inland) needed to restore lost populations. |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | Widespread reintroduction of extensive grazing to coastal slopes & heathland has unquestionably aided species, but more widespread grazing / disturbance of outcrop grasslands likely to encourage further spread |
Species Assessment
Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales |
Recovery potential/expectation: | Medium-high |
National Monitoring Resource: | Combination - insufficient |
Species Comments: | Loss of up to 71% of subsites since 1982 probably due to (i) increased height of vegetation (both grass & scrub), (ii) build-up of dry organic litter/mor , humus, & proliferation of pleurocarpus mosses all leading to loss of bare mineral soil microsites for germination & growth. A changing climate also implicated & increasing aerial nutrient deposition may be involved. Fortunately, species thought to have long-lived spores (>34 years) so restoration from soil spore bank possible. |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Maintain or introduce programme of practical management at all sites known since c. 1980 including scrub clearance, moderate to heavy extensive grazing etc. to maintain sward at 1-2cm max. Targeted management of isolated inland colonies especially important as particularly vulnerable to extinction. Investigate options to link isolated heathland / rock outcrop sites to wider heathland landscape.
Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales
Action type: Habitat management
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites
High priority sites: Mullion Cliff to Predannack Cliff SSSI. West Lizard SSSI. Caerthillian to Kennack SSSI. Kennack to Coverack SSSI. Goonhilly Downs SSSI
Comments: Significant management work currently underway (2023-2025) through Species Recovery Programme within various Lizard SSSIs.
Key Action 2
Proposed Action: Maintain database (established by David Pearman & Cornish botanists) of all current or post 1950 sites, to include known population size/extent, history and management. Monitor all populations on 1-3 year cycle.
Action targets: 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented
Action type: Targeted monitoring
Duration: >10 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites
High priority sites: As listed under action 1
Comments:
Key Action 3
Proposed Action: Undertake research into autecology of species & response to various management regimes. Issues to assess include role of humus (undecomposed dry litter & mor humus) build-up; pleurocarpous moss growth; impact of drier springs etc. Review roles of grazing & disturbance in mitigating impacts.
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites
High priority sites: Mullion Cliff to Predannack Cliff SSSI. West Lizard SSSI. Goonhilly Downs SSSI. Kennack to Coverack SSSI
Comments: Introduction of conservation grazing does not appear to have entirely reversed fortunes of species. More detailed assessment of causes at the micro-level required.
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.