Bloody Whitebeam (Sorbus vexans)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Vascular plant > flowering plant > Tree
Red List Status: Endangered (Not Relevant) [EN(nr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Sorbus vexans
UKSI Recommended Authority: E.F.Warb.
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: in Stroh et al., 2014
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: No
Justification: English endemic with c. 70 fruiting and immature plants in about 7 sites on North Devon/Somerset Coast, hence 'Critically Endangered’ (Rivers et al. 2019) though probably stable in medium term. As for S. margaretae and S. subcuneata, long term habitat degradation occurring due to spread of rhododendron, high deer numbers stopping regeneration, and cessation of coppicing combining to threaten it long term. Wider habitat management much more important.
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: No
Justification: Wider habitat management for North Devon/Somerset coastal woodland much more important; without it in medium term Sorbus will become restricted to open rocks.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: Yes
Justification: North Devon/Somerset coast woodlands and rocks would benefit from more regular coppicing, removal of rhododendron and control of deer populations to allow regeneration

Species Assessment

Not relevant as no Key Actions defined.

Key Actions

No Key Actions Defined

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.