No Parking Whitebeam (Sorbus admonitor)
Key Details
| Taxonomic Groups: | Vascular plant > flowering plant > Tree |
| Red List Status: | Endangered (Not Relevant) [EN(nr)] |
| D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
| Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
| Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
| UKSI Recommended Name: | Sorbus admonitor |
| UKSI Recommended Authority: | M.Proctor |
| UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
| Red List Citation: | in Stroh et al., 2014 |
| Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
| Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | Healthy recently censused population of 110 trees (Rich & Cann 2009) virtually confined to one site at Watersmeet and adjacent Sillery Sands and well looked after in Watersmeet SSSI. Conservation best achieved indirectly by addressing wider issues in Devon/Somerset coastal woodlands to allowing spread in the future. |
| Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | Can be looked after as part of Watersmeet SSSI. Species well understood and with detailed data, under not threat, low priority for action. Species relatively easy to identify/survey |
| Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
| Response: | Yes |
| Justification: | North Devon/Somerset coast woodlands and rocks would benefit from more regular coppicing, removal of rhododendron and control of deer populations to allow regeneration |
Species Assessment
Not relevant as no Key Actions defined.
Key Actions
No Key Actions Defined
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.