Phlegra fasciata
Key Details
| Taxonomic Groups: | Invertebrate > spider (Araneae) > Spider |
| Red List Status: | Near Threatened (Not Relevant) [NT(nr)] |
| D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
| Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
| Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
| UKSI Recommended Name: | Phlegra fasciata |
| UKSI Recommended Authority: | (Hahn, 1826) |
| UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
| Red List Citation: | Harvey et al., 2017 |
| Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
| Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
| Response: | Yes |
| Justification: | NT, criteria: B2ab(ii,iv): no evidence of recent decline. Confined to the S coasts of England and Wales. |
| Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
| Response: | Yes |
| Justification: | Absent from many apparently suitable sites |
| Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | This species would not benefit from untargeted management |
Species Assessment
| Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): | 2. Biological status assessment exists |
| Recovery potential/expectation: | Low - Relict or natural rarity |
| National Monitoring Resource: | Opportunistic - insufficient |
| Species Comments: | Entirely restricted to S coast, in a variety of hot, dry, south-facing habitats including shingle, stable sand dunes and sparse cliff-top maritime grassland |
Key Actions
Key Action 1
Proposed Action: Targeted survey of all known sites and similar intervening habitat
Action targets: 2. Biological status assessment exists
Action type: Status survey/review
Duration: 2 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites
High priority sites: south coast from N Kent to Cornwall
Comments:
Key Action 2
Proposed Action: Autecological research to establish microhabitat requirements at apparently contrasting sites
Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood
Action type: Scientific research
Duration: 3-5 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites
High priority sites: Sandwich Bay, Kent (dunes); Chesil/Portland, Dorset (shingle); Outer Froward Point, Devo (cliff-top).
Comments: Target reliable and contrasting sites
Key Action 3
Proposed Action: Manage scrub and graze/mow aftermath where needed to maintain open grassland
Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales
Action type: Habitat management
Duration: >10 years
Scale of Implementation: ≤ 20 sites
High priority sites:
Comments: Liaise with site managers to ensure integration into management plans
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.