Welch's Money-spider (Erigone welchi)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Invertebrate > spider (Araneae) > Spider
Red List Status: Endangered (Not Relevant) [EN(nr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Erigone welchi
UKSI Recommended Authority: Jackson, 1911
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: Harvey et al., 2017
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: EN, criteria: B2ab(ii,iv): threat status likely to be reduced at next review because no longer evidence of overall decline but may well still be threatened. More recent records from Wales than England/Scotland.
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Very rare even in relation to its specialist habitat
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: Yes
Justification: Genus generally disperses by ballooning. If this ability has been retained despite long isolation, may colonise newly created Sphagnum lawns. Likely dispersal distances are not known.

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 2. Biological status assessment exists
Recovery potential/expectation: Low - Combination or other (detail in comments)
National Monitoring Resource: Opportunistic - insufficient
Species Comments: In open Sphagnum lawns in permanent deep water within peat mires, usually at 200-500 m. Recovery potential in England likely to be low because of restricted and hydrologically challenged habitat. Apparently faring better in W Wales with possibility of climate related W range shift.

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Targeted re-survey of recent and nearby sites, using standardised methodology to assess current status (and establish baseline for national monitoring programme)

Action targets: 2. Biological status assessment exists

Action type: Status survey/review

Duration: 2 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: New Forest (Denny Bog), Hants; Kinder Scout (Mermaid's Pool), Derbys.; Widdybank Moss, Upper Teesdale; Graystone Hills, Northumberland

Comments: Significant H&S issues with survey for this species - best practise for very wet sites to be strictly observed.

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Autecological research to better characterise habitat requirements, and inform site management

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites:

Comments: Include the NW Wales sites where the spider is relatively abundant, possibly comparing with Greystone Hills, Northumbria, if sufficient can be found there. Findings of Actions 1 and 2 should help to elucidate possible range shift.

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: Provide targeted advice to project/land managers of peatland management/restoration/re-creation restoration projects (including palludiculture) in relevant areas, on the species location/s and habitat/management requirements (informed by actions 1 and 2) to avoid damage to current resource and maximise new colonisation opportunities.

Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified

Action type: Advice & support

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: New Forest (Denny Bog), Hants; Kinder Scout (Mermaid's Pool), Derbys.; Widdybank Moss, Upper Teesdale; Graystone Hills, Northumberland

Comments: A liaison action for BAS, NE and site managers.

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.