Fen Raft Spider (Dolomedes plantarius)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Invertebrate > spider (Araneae) > Spider
Red List Status: Vulnerable (Not Relevant) [VU(nr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Dolomedes plantarius
UKSI Recommended Authority: (Clerck, 1757)
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: Harvey et al., 2017
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: VU, criteria: D2: may lose threat status at next review. Two remnant populations in England, one in Wales. Four, English, translocated populations are not conservation dependent.
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Highly fragmented, often very small natural remnant populations, with very limited dispersal ability. Species recovery programme to date shows strong response to targeted measures to overcome both.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: No
Justification: This species would not benefit from untargeted management

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 8. Species recovering
Recovery potential/expectation: Medium-high
National Monitoring Resource: Combination - insufficient
Species Comments: Shows strong response to targeted measures to overcome low dispersibility and isolation; well developed, long term recovery programme includes successful translocations. Medium-high recovery potential may be limited by climate change (droughts and sea level rise) and extent of restoration of appropriate lowland wetland habitats. Monitoring 'structured sufficient' in E. Anglia but not in E. Sussex

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Expand translocation programme beyond Broadland to reduce risk from sea level rise/salinisation, mitigate against climate change and meet recovery target of (min.) 12 self-sustaining populations.

Action targets: 7. Best approach adopted at appropriate scales

Action type: (Re-)introduction

Duration: 6-10 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: Restored E Anglian Fen basin fens

Comments: Demonstrated potential for expansion of translocated populations means that new populations expected to fill suitable extensive habitat areas without further introductions there. Current scoping study will estimate delivery action costs.

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Develop eDNA monitoring tools for tracking changing distributions, including of translocated populations.

Action targets: 8. Species recovering

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 10 sites

High priority sites:

Comments: NERC PhD application with additional funding in place (BA/Natur am Byth) for next three years to develop techniques. Roll out will transform monitoring capability, though with unknown cost, in 3 years+ time. Likely to be transferable to other hard-to-monitor spider species.

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: Seek opportunities in the vicinity of all populations to aid spread by improving connectivity and extent of suitable wetland habitat.

Action targets: 8. Species recovering

Action type: Landscape/catchment/marine management

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 10 sites

High priority sites: Upper and Lower Waveney Valley, Yare and Thurne Valleys, Pevensey Levels - core fen sites within the E. Anglian Fen basis also likely to be involved over next 5-10 years.

Comments: Delivery within landscape recovery programme/s

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.