Scarce Aspen Midget (Phyllonorycter sagitella)
Key Details
| Taxonomic Groups: | Invertebrate > insect - moth > Moth |
| Red List Status: | (Not Relevant) [(not listed)(nr)] |
| D5 Status: | |
| Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
| Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
| UKSI Recommended Name: | Phyllonorycter sagitella |
| UKSI Recommended Authority: | (Bjerkander, 1790) |
| UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
| Red List Citation: | (not listed) |
| Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
| Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | (No GB Red List for micro-moths.) At the time of the last BAP Review this species had a highly restricted distribution in the West Midlands. Subsequently it has colonised a number of counties on the eastern side of England, presumably as a result of migrants from the continent. |
| Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | Now more widespread and common than it has ever been. Recovery complete. |
| Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
| Response: | No |
| Justification: | This species does not require habitat mosaics or successional stages as the larvae feed on Aspen, which is not dependant on that management. |
Species Assessment
Not relevant as no Key Actions defined.
Key Actions
No Key Actions Defined
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.