Psammodius asper

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Invertebrate > insect - beetle (Coleoptera) > Scarab beetle or ally
Red List Status: Near Threatened (Not Relevant) [NT(nr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Psammodius asper
UKSI Recommended Authority: (Fabricius, 1775)
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: Lane and Mann, 2016
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: Only known from four English sites since 1990. Formerly more widespread at dune sites around the coast
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: At its extant dune sites it is likely to be secure where scrub control is practiced. However, it is likely to be a poor disperser so in order for it to recolonise its former sites it will need help in moving
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: Yes
Justification: Increased habitat mosaics in and around its known sites (open sandy areas- sand dunes) would be beneficial to Psammodius asper assuming they are within its dispersal range. For example scrub removal to create further open sandy areas would benefit the species

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 2. Biological status assessment exists
Recovery potential/expectation: Low - Life history factor/s
National Monitoring Resource: Opportunistic - insufficient
Species Comments: Psammodius asper can sometimes be found in good numbers at it's extant sites. It is saprophagous and possibly coprophagus (rabbit) so ought not be limited by habitat availability suggesting it is a poor disperser. It is largely nocturnal and may be under recorded.

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Field study to determine best survey methods, breeding ecology and establish the dispersal characteristics of Psammodius asper to determine its likelihood of finding its former sites where suitable habitat remains.

Action targets: 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites: Formby, Lancashire (SD20), Risby Warren NR North Lincolnshire (SE91), Northam Burrows NR, North Devon (SS43), and Dungeness/Lydd, East Kent (TR01 and TR02).

Comments: Concurrent with action 2. Understanding ecology in relation to microhabitats and resources is vital to identify suitable habitat, as a basis for next action.

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Survey by non-lethal methods at suitable formerly occupied sites to determine if it has been over-looked, especially those close to extant sites.

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Targeted monitoring

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 10 sites

High priority sites: Previously (pre 1990) occupied sites should be sought from the Scarabidae Recording Scheme and Local Environmental Records Centres

Comments:

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: If population size allows and dispersal ability is proven to be poor, investigate translocation to unoccupied former sites.

Action targets: 5. Remedial action identified

Action type: (Re-)introduction

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 10 sites

High priority sites: Previously (pre 1990) occupied sites should be sought from the Scarabidae Recording Scheme and Local Environmental Records Centres. This action is dependent on the outcomes of previous actions.

Comments: Dependant on outcomes of actions 1 and 2

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.