Carpelimus schneideri
Key Details
Taxonomic Groups: | Invertebrate > insect - beetle (Coleoptera) > Rove beetle (macrostaph) |
Red List Status: | Near Threatened (Not Relevant) [NT(nr)] |
D5 Status: | Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022) |
Section 41 Status: | (not listed) |
Taxa Included Synonym: | (none) |
UKSI Recommended Name: | Carpelimus schneideri |
UKSI Recommended Authority: | (Ganglbauer, 1895) |
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: | (none specified) |
Red List Citation: | Boyce, 2022 |
Notes on taxonomy/listing: | (none) |
Criteria
Question 1: | Does species need conservation or recovery in England? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | An intertidal saline specialist found on bare intertidal mud and sand. The increasing threat of rising sea levels to coastal habitats mean that conservation actions will be required to conserve the habitats this species depends on in the long-term. |
Question 2: | Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions? |
Response: | No |
Justification: | There are a suite of threatened rove beetles occurring on British saltmarshes. These are at risk from the impacts of sea level rise and increasing storm surges. Both are thought to be a consequence of current changes in climate (especially the ongoing increase in average global temperatures). They cause erosion of the saltmarsh through increasing inundation and wave action. Most of our saltmarshes are backed by artificial sea defences, so it is not possible for saltmarsh habitats to move back inland naturally in response to such changes. General mitigation strategies for sea level rise such as staged retreats and realignment of sea defences will benefit the entire saltmarsh fauna and flora. |
Question 3: | At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages? |
Response: | Yes |
Justification: | The main threat to this species is loss of salt marsh habitats to rising sea levels. Management and mitigation against sea level rise such as staged retreats and realignment of sea defences will benefit this species. |
Species Assessment
Not relevant as no Key Actions defined.
Key Actions
No Key Actions Defined
Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.