Wild Asparagus (Asparagus prostratus)

Key Details

Taxonomic Groups: Vascular plant > flowering plant > Herbaceous plant
Red List Status: Endangered (Not Relevant) [EN(nr)]
D5 Status: Included in the baseline Red List Index for England (Wilkins, Wilson & Brown, 2022)
Section 41 Status: (not listed)
Taxa Included Synonym: (none)
UKSI Recommended Name: Asparagus prostratus
UKSI Recommended Authority: Dumort.
UKSI Recommended Qualifier: (none specified)
Red List Citation: in Stroh et al., 2014
Notes on taxonomy/listing: (none)

Criteria

Question 1: Does species need conservation or recovery in England?
Response: Yes
Justification: EN in GB, VU in England. Total England population of this endemic species numbers c. 1300 plants
Question 2: Does recovery/ conservation depend on species-specific actions?
Response: Yes
Justification: Some populations very small and/or of single sex or poor sex ratio. Ex situ bolstering of these populations has proven necessary. Additionally, natural regeneration appears very poor, & little understood.
Question 3: At a landscape scale, would the species benefit from untargeted habitat management to increase habitat mosaics, structural diversity, or particular successional stages?
Response: No
Justification: This species would not benefit from untargeted management

Species Assessment

Current step on the Species Recovery Curve (SRC): 3. National Monitoring Plan agreed and implemented
Recovery potential/expectation: Low - Life history factor/s
National Monitoring Resource: Combination - insufficient
Species Comments: A very long-lived, endemic perennial of cliff slope grasslands, clitter & flushes, & sand dunes. Survives in most English localities, though in some cases in very small numbers (exacerbated by dioecious nature of species). Ecology perhaps poorly known - particularly in relation to grazing history & recruitment from seed.

Key Actions

Key Action 1

Proposed Action: Monitor all populations on <5 year basis, recording number of plants, sex ratio, presence of seedlings, vegetation condition & structure, management etc. Review management / key actions in light of findings.

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Status survey/review

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 50 sites

High priority sites: All.

Comments: Frequent monitoring will allow ongoing assessment of the state of populations (particularly vulnerable/small ones) & increase our understanding of the autecology of the species

Key Action 2

Proposed Action: Investigate autecology of A. prostratus through a programme of research & management trials, to assess factors including impacts of different grazing animals (including historic grazing regimes), pollination, & seedling establishment

Action targets: 4. Autecology and pressures understood

Action type: Scientific research

Duration: 3-5 years

Scale of Implementation: ≤ 5 sites

High priority sites:

Comments: Sites for A. prostratus were clearly grazed in the past, but presents a conundrum: how much does grazing damage this highly palatable species? Yet does grazing create bare/open microsites for seedling establishment?

Key Action 3

Proposed Action: Maintain or enhance populations at all sites through traditional/appropriate management (e.g. grazing), including assessing need to bolster small populations / reintroduce lost populations through introduction of material raised ex situ. Action may include the potential notification of new SSSIs where no other mechanism for protection is available.

Action targets: 6. Recovery solutions trialled

Action type: Habitat management

Duration: >10 years

Scale of Implementation: National

High priority sites:

Comments: Management should target smaller sites (with < 10 plants) as a priority.

Return to List

Acknowledgment:
Data used on this website are adapted from Threatened species recovery actions 2025 baseline (JP065): Technical report and spreadsheet user guide (Natural England, 2025). Available here.